On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Werner Koch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:22, [email protected] said: > > > Similarly, if the list concludes that users have to understand > > keys then that's also easy - we know that will never happen > > and so could also call it a day. > > Users do understand mail addresses and thus a key should be identified > by the mail address and not by any other property. > > > reinvent X.400 email security here please? (Or PEM, or MOSS, > > What problem do you see with MOSS? Except for the commonly ignored > micalg parameter it is a well working part of MIME and not a problem at > all. This is true for S?MIME as well as for PGP/MIME. We are still > talking about mail, tight? Or is the goal of the list to replace the > rfc822 mail format - that will never happen in the foreseeable future. >
I think we should be open to a possible change for messaging in general and not limit ourselves to mail. > > > Salam-Shalom, > > Werner > > -- > Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. > > _______________________________________________ > Endymail mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail > -- Best regards, Kathleen
_______________________________________________ Endymail mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail
