On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 10:13, [email protected] said: > Right I agree that there is a RFC5751 sec 3.1 ( > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5751#page-18 ) that mentions the > message/rfc822, but unless I'm missing something one still has to specify > the intended recipient, and a return path. Even if the body and most
Mixmaster does this for ages. Mutt has support for Mixmaster for more than 15 years. Changing this to work at all levels using MIME containers won't be too hard. For stronger anonymity the MTAs may use TOR or similar. Agreed, this is not a problem of standards but of doing the work. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Endymail mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail
