On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the notion of enforcement > comingling with "no obligations on receipt" of the key. Enforcement is an > obligation. Trevor sais 'no Technical obligations'. I think what he means here is that people who use this technology are probably going to use clients that make a best effort to not leak confidential bits but not require the use of trustworthy hardware that can provide technical enforcement. In other words, I can use a completely open source client modified in any way I like without having to get the executable signed by someone the rights owner trusts. In a corporate context, this makes perfect sense. If I am downloading company confidential material to my laptop, I want to be able to read it on the laptop but I don't want to accidentally send a copy to someone else by doing an unfortunate 'reply all'.
_______________________________________________ Endymail mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/endymail
