Hi Blair,

Do you think it'd be a good idea to decrease the ping interval? Maybe to 200 
milliseconds?

  Kind regards,

  Philip Bennefall
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Blair Holloway 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 7:06 AM
  Subject: Re: [ENet-discuss] Some ENet issues


  By default, Enet sends (reliable) ping packets every 500ms, if no other 
reliable traffic was sent in that interval. If you're sending reliable packets 
30 times per second instead of 2 times, it's possible Enet is deriving a more 
accurate average round trip time.


  - Blair


  On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Philip Bennefall <[email protected]> 
wrote:

    Hi Lee and others,

    I am having some minor issues with ENet.

    First, I'm trying to get the average up and downstream for each peer by 
using the appropriate data fields in the peer structure but it always returns 0 
for some reason. The same seems to be true with the host structure as well.

    Second, when I look at the average round trip time for a peer, this value 
is only correct if I send out a few reliable packets. on localhost, for 
instance, I ran a test where I sent 30 unreliable packets every second. I poll 
the network every 5 milliseconds, but got an average round trip of 44 
milliseconds. When I changed it to reliable packets, however, I got an average 
of 12 which seems much more reasonable. Is this intended behavior?

    Thanks in advance for any help.

    Kind regards,

    Philip Bennefall

    _______________________________________________
    ENet-discuss mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss






------------------------------------------------------------------------------



  Internal Virus Database is out of date.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
  Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2662 - Release Date: 02/01/10 
12:37:00
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss

Reply via email to