The current donor list is actually awful and quite wrong. My bank mails the
foundation a check for $100 every month (so the foundation doesn't have to
pay paypal or CC processing fees) and has since 2008 I believe yet I only
show up as a donor for 2009. My bank statement says otherwise as does the
epic circuit board foot plaque[1] Behdad so graciously sent me. Pretty sure
I'm the only individual who has one of those currently.

It doesn't really matter (to me) how much someone sends the foundation or
the foundation says they gave as an individual. Everyone gives within their
own means. However, we should make sure to emphasize the more sizable
corporate donors who help the foundation massively with large investments.

[1] http://behdad.org/blog/mces/image/2gnome-ram-award-you.jpg


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Tobias Mueller <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> I am thinking about the current list of Friends of GNOME. It's a
> complicated list and we have potentially five categories to put the donors
> in: http://www.gnome.org/friends/previous-donors/
>
> I am wondering whether it makes sense to get rid of the categories and
> only have one list of donors. It would make things easier on our side. And
> while I see that it makes sense at first to distinguish a 1200 USD donation
> from a 5 USD donation, it's not very well done currently, e.g. recurring
> donations are grouped by frequency without giving a hint on the amount
> donated. So we might as well get rid of the categories alltogether.
>
> Alternatively, we bring some visual love to that list, but I am unable to
> do that.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
>   Tobi
> _______________________________________________
> engagement-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
>



-- 
Jeff Schroeder

Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
http://www.digitalprognosis.com
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Reply via email to