On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 2:45 AM Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:18 +0200, Ekaterina Gerasimova wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > there are a number of external resources about GNOME which are used > > by > > people for information. I am specifically thinking about the pages on > > Wikipedia here, but I'm sure that there is other stuff as well. It > > would look more professional if GNOME's public-facing resources are > > at > > least correct. > > > > Is the engagement team willing to maintain at least the most > > prominent > > of these resources? Would it help to have a list of them with > > frequencies on how often they should be checked? > > > > For example: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Foundation - had an old list of > > board members (fixed now) and doesn't have up-to-date information > > about the Foundation > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_GNOME_Project - is out of date > > (apparently next GUADEC is in A Coruña) > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Users_And_Developers_European_Con > > ference > > is… well, dull and outdated > > Remember that it's best for people external to the core GNOME project > to update those (to avoid astro-turfing accusations), and make sure to > include external references when making updates (not only links to > gnome.org websites). > > Yes, that's what I remember.. that we ourselves can't update it, but external contributors. That's why I was suggesting Sumana or someone else so we don't get accused of putting our own agenda in the Wikipedia entry. sri > Cheers > > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list >
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
