Sriram Ramkrishna <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I get that the infographic is intended for new contributors. The
>> question was which contributors: are we talking about new engagement
>> team recruits, or any new contributor? This will affect the kind of
>> information we include.
>>
>>
> Ah, well for now I think we can focus on engagement team, and then expand
> the scope going forward.  What do you think?
>

That's totally acceptable as a direction. The reason I asked is that your
original draft looks rather engineering-focused. The release cycle is
interesting to engagement contributors, but I'm not sure the specifics of
the release schedule are the main pieces of information they need.

It might be a good exercise to review what we think the most critical
pieces of information are for new engagement contributors who are
completely new to GNOME and Free Software. Things that come to my mind are:

 * We produce two releases a year, March to September and September to
March.
 * GNOME doesn't have its own product: distros ship our code.
 * Different companies and volunteers work on the project.
 * Diverse teams and activities are involved in producing our releases -
documentation, translations, accessibility, design, QA, etc
 * The main activities that the Engagement Team does, and the times
throughout the year that they happen.

I've had a rough go at sketching out an infographic that communicates some
of this information. Some things are missing, and some parts are quite
rough:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5031519/gnome-year-infographic.png

Allan
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list

Reply via email to