Great, thanks for the update! What are next steps for this? Can we take that as a decision to move forward with posting to social media then?
.............................................................. Nuritzi Sanchez | +1.650.218.7388 | Endless > On Jul 22, 2016, at 4:14 AM, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote: >> Tobias Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >>> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:32:36PM +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: >>> > Oh, interesting I didn't think of that. That said, the share-alike >>> > license >>> > does grant Facebook and Twitter rights to duplicate which is all they are >>> > asking anyways. >>> Last time I've checked Facebook ToS they wanted rights to sublicence >>> assests with their terms. >> >> That's still the case. >> >>> That is, of course, not compatible with any share-alike licence. >> >> Which is also the view that at least one person gave me when I asked on >> #creativecommons a little while ago. > > I've received some information from the Senior Counsel at Creative Commons. > (As you'd expect, this can't be treated as concrete legal advice.) The main > message is that, while the terms of service of social media sites do > technically contravene the terms of Creative Commons licenses, in practical > terms it probably isn't too much to worry about. > > Allan > _______________________________________________ > engagement-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
