On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 11:02 PM, Allan Day <[email protected]> wrote: > Might be nice to think about including those, certainly. It somewhat depends > on the overall design and not letting it get too cluttered.
Sure, I was just throwing something I'd like to see that will hopefully be taken into account when someone does the new design. > My impression is that very few people edit pages on > gnome.org currently, and the content doesn't change all that often. That's something I didn't take into account and you're probably right about it. > • Translations - we haven't got them working for the current website - how > much work would it be to get them working? Would it be easier for a > different setup? You mentionned the flatpak website earlier: is it translatable? Translations are probably easier to setup with any static generator than with Wordpress, as we have many tools that deal with the common formats used in such cases (Markdown and HTML mostly). -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
