See your points. Thanks for the clarifications Nuritzi.
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Nuritzi Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2018, at 2:39 AM, Oliver Propst <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Ok I see. While I don't see anything particularly with the decision to > post the interview on the Engagement Blog I view the post mostly as an > interview. Would see it as good to (at least) including a link to the > *fundraiser. > gnome.org have been used for spreading community pleas (don't view it as > wrong). > > > The post on the Engagement blog is a follow up to the campaign we ran in > December: https://twitter.com/gnome/status/940914200926355456. The > article on the Engagement blog includes a link to the fundraiser in two > places, so it's not just an interview. > > For more context on the Engagement blog vs gnome.org article decision, > during Engagement calls, we talked about our broader fundraising strategy > and the fact that we don't want to detract donations from Friends of GNOME > in the future. We wanted to reserve gnome.org posts for things like > Friends of GNOME and other fudraisers that directly impact the Foundation. > As a way to still help people like pippin whose efforts are extremely > important to GNOME, we decided to do the interviews on the Engagement blog > with links to fundraising campaigns and also post about their campaigns > using our official GNOME social media accounts. > > If you'd like to further discuss the strategy, feel free to add the agenda > item to our meeting etherpad and attend one of our Engagement meetings! > > -- -mvh Oliver Propst
_______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
