----- Original Message ----- > From: "Yaniv Kaul" <[email protected]> > To: "Roy Golan" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, February 6, 2012 5:10:16 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] bridgless networks > > On 02/06/2012 04:47 PM, Roy Golan wrote: > > Hi All > > > > Lately I've been working on a design of bridge-less network feature > > in the engine. > > You can see it in > > http://www.ovirt.org/wiki/Features/Design/Network/Bridgeless_Networks#Bridge-less_Networks > > > > Please review the design. > > Note, there are some open issues, you can find in the relevant > > section. > > Reviews and comments are very welcome. > > > > Thanks, > > Roy > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > 0. Fixed some typos in the wiki. There are others I couldn't > understand. > 1. "Also looking forward a capable of running VMs nics should be > bridged > on regular nics and un-bridged in case of dedicated special nics" - > don't understand what it means (English-wise too). correct, the phrasing is bad. I meant that when we are doing the actual attach, should we implicitly choose not to create a bridge on vNic or SRIOV ? Anyway for now the best and fastest approach I think is to give freedom of choice - the user will choose if the network should be bridged or not during the attach.
> 2. "UI shall user shall" . > 3. Not sure the REST API is complete. How is the property set on the > logical network (upon creation or later) ? please see my former post. I suggest we won't have this property on the logical network at all. > 4. So, if there's no bridge on my bond, can I now use the bond > methods > that are incompatible with bridges and therefore we did not allow > them > until now? why not? is VDSM blocking those? > > Y. > > > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
