+1 on moving status meetings to irc, starting next one. On 28/03/12 16:48, Livnat Peer wrote: > On 28/03/12 16:17, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > Hi: > > I just learned that this team's open project meeting is held as a > teleconference. > > Would you consider switching it to a regular IRC meeting, perhaps with > an occasional phone call? > >> We actually discussed this option a few months ago and decided to keep >> it via phone, it seemed right at the time when we mostly discussed >> features design and tried to get to conclusions for on-going (endless >> ;)) threads. > > > IRC meetings have many advantages in an open project: low barrier of > access, easier to understand for non-native speakers, meeting log is > archivable and searchable, and more inviting for the project. > > For phone meetings, do you publish the audio recording? That is not > optimal, but at least it allows for someone to transcribe the discussion. > > >> All the results of the calls are documented in the wiki pages of the >> different features and being reflected in the different mailing threads >> that we have. > > >> Having said that I think it is time to reconsider the decision because >> we are soon moving to a stabilization cycle before May's release. > >> I suggest we'll have our next meeting on IRC and see how it goes. > > >> Thanks, Livnat > > Cheers - Karsten >> _______________________________________________ >> Engine-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
