----- Original Message ----- > >> On 05/06/2012 10:03 AM, Ori Liel wrote: > >> > Still need to decide about this: > >> > > >> >> 1) what's the name you'd give this parameter? job-id? batch-id? > >> >> flow-id? command-id? correlation-id??? > >> > >> job-id will confuse us with engine's job-id which is a single > >> command > >> today. > >> correleation-id is pretty long and confusing as implies on > >> correlation > >> of something. > >> > >> I'm for flow-id or batch-id. > >> batch-id sounds the right one to me, as this is identifying a > >> batch > >> of > >> calls. > > >How about log-id? > >It isn't supposed to be unique, or of any format, it's just used to > >log calls, so log-id is the most natural (or log-tag or whatever > >name you prefer). > > > >Also I think it's more of a header-type parameter since it's > >metadata for the call, not an actual parameter that influences the > >outcome of the "flow". > > I actually believe you're right, it probably is better to pass this > parameter as > an http header. You've changed my mind about this (objections, > anyone, to passing > it as a header as opposed to passing it as a url parameter)? > > About log_id - it could sound like there are numerous logs, and the > user is asked > to specify the ID of the log he wishes to write to. But perhaps: > log_entry_id?
op_id? (operation_id) > > Thanks, > > Ori > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
