----- Original Message -----
> From: "Einav Cohen" <[email protected]>
> To: "Andrew Cathrow" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected], "Simon Grinberg" <[email protected]>, "Saggi
> Mizrahi" <[email protected]>, "Geert
> Jansen" <[email protected]>, "Ori Liel" <[email protected]>, "Yair Zaslavsky"
> <[email protected]>, "Ayal Baron"
> <[email protected]>, "Miki Kenneth" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:05:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] PosixFS: GUI mock-ups have been updated
>
> > ...
> >
> > The important thing is that it's clear what it is - eg. the
> > remote/target not the local mount point. That could be accomplished
> > in the tool tip, etc.
>
> So if there will be a tool-tip (or similar) in the GUI explaining
> what this field is supposed to be, are you OK with keeping the term
> "Path" (in both GUI and rest-api)?
I am , does everyone else agree.
>
> >
> > > Andrew/Geert/Simon/Ayal/Miki/Saggi/others: Please feel free to
> > > suggest a new term, or vote for one of the previously-discussed
> > > terms ("Remote Path" / "Path" / "Mount Spec" / "File System
> > > URI").
> > > If no decision will be made here, the term will remain as-is,
> > > i.e.
> > > "Path".
> > >
> > ...
>
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
