On 21/05/12 16:09, Einav Cohen wrote: >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Doron Fediuck" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 3:59:07 PM >> >> On 21/05/12 14:49, Einav Cohen wrote: >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> From: "Geert Jansen" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 2:44:09 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05/21/2012 12:44 PM, Einav Cohen wrote: >>>> >>>>>> i was wondering why you have pulled out retrans and timeout? Are >>>>>> these >>>>>> the most important ones? >>>>> >>>>> Sorry - not sure I got you. Can you please clarify your question? >>>> >>>> Sorry, I meant, why do retrans and timeout have their own input >>>> boxes, >>>> while the other options need to be set via the 'mount options' >>>> box. >>>> There's quite a few other important nfs options like tcp, rsize, >>>> wsize, >>>> and possibly nointr and hard. I was wondering why we took these >>>> specific >>>> two and gave them their separate boxes but not the other ones. >>> >>> Retrans and Timeout got separate boxes since they have separate >>> parameters in the api (GUI was determined by api). >>> Ayal - any reason for these specific two values having parameters >>> of their own? >>> >> Reading some of the thread and reviews I can say that these 3 options >> (version, retrans and timeo) >> are advanced NFS features, which in most cases should not be used at >> all. VDSM has very good defaults, >> and in some specific cases there's a need to change these defaults. >> Only in such case these options >> should be modified. > > No question that vdsm has very good defaults and only rarely should they be > modified. > However, why not change everything via "mount options"? why do we have > separate parameters specifically for "retrans" and "timeout" (in addition to > "mount options")? As Geert said, we have also tcp, rsize, wsize, etc. So why > "retrans" and "timeout" got parameters of their own and the others didn't > (i.e. if there is a need to change tcp, rsize, wsize, the only way to do it > is via the generic "mount options")? I think it has to do w/ the vdsm implementation of it, maybe also connection management in the backend. But I think Livnat may have some better understandings of that. > >> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Geert >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Engine-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Engine-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel >> >> >> -- >> >> /d >> >> "Hi, my name is Any Key. Please don't hit me!" >> _______________________________________________ >> Engine-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel >> >> >>
-- /d Why doesn't DOS ever say "EXCELLENT command or filename!" _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
