----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <[email protected]>
> To: "Eli Mesika" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "engine-devel" <[email protected]>, "Michael Pasternak" 
> <[email protected]>, "Simon Grinberg"
> <[email protected]>, "Dan Kenigsberg" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 12:02:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [Design for 3.2 RFE] Improving proxy selection 
> algorithm for Power Management operations
> 
> On 11/09/2012 10:52 AM, Eli Mesika wrote:
> 
> >> >
> >> >  > FenceWrapper
> >> >
> >> >i understand danken suggested going this way, rather than than
> >> >another
> >> >instance of vdsm.
> >> >is vdsm only calling these scripts today and all logic is in
> >> >engine,
> >> >or
> >> >does vdsm has any logic in wrapping these scripts (not a blocker
> >> >to
> >> >doing FenceWrapper, just worth extracting that logic from vdsm to
> >> >such a
> >> >script, then using it in both. i hope answer is 'no logic'...)
> > vdsm has some logic that maps between the call passed to it from
> > engine and the actual parameters generated for the script.
> > AFAIK, this logic only "builds" the correct arguments for the
> > command according to the agent type
> >
> 
> can we extract it to an external wrapper?
> I'd hate to fix bugs/changes twice for this.

I'll check it with danken on SUN

> 
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

Reply via email to