----- Original Message ----- > From: "Doron Fediuck" <[email protected]> > To: "Yaniv Kaul" <[email protected]> > Cc: "Laszlo Hornyak" <[email protected]>, "engine-devel" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 6:10:55 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] host cpu feature > > > Alternative idea, inspired by "Thus, if you hit any bugs, you are > > on > > your own" (http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsCPU wrt > > 'host-passthrough'): > > A config option to determine if we use host-model or > > host-passthrough. > > Y. > > > > I do not think the engine should go to this level. > ie- it can ask for passthrough as a feature, and the > actual implementation is handled by vdsm. >
If vdsm decides over host-passthrough or host-model, then how will the engine user know what exactly his VM gets. I think vdsm must be told exactly what to do. _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
