On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:53:41PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote: <snip>
> > 1) Can you provide more info on why there is a exception for 'lvm > > based > > block domain'. Its not coming out clearly. > File based domains are responsible for syncing up object manipulation > (creation\deletion) > The backend is responsible for making sure it all works either by having a > single writer (NFS) or having it's own locking mechanism (gluster). > In our LVM based domains VDSM is responsible for basic object manipulation. > The current design uses an approach where there is a single host responsible > for object creation\deleteion it is the SRM\SDM\SPM\S?M. > If we ever find a way to make it fully clustered without a big hit in > performance the S?M requirement will be removed form that type of domain. I would like to see us maintain a LOCALFS domain as well. For this, we would also need SRM, correct? -- Adam Litke <a...@us.ibm.com> IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
