----- Original Message ----- > From: "Roy Golan" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 1:31:55 PM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Attaching a console should be controllable > > On 12/10/2012 02:28 PM, Frantisek Kobzik wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Just a simple question. I'm writing an engine counterpart for this > > vdsm feature: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878459 > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9359 > > > > Long story short, it adds the possibility of controlling adding the > > virtio serial console to a VM. > > > > I'm going to add a new column "console_enabled" to vm_static and a
I'd make it serial_console since console can mean different things (eg vnc console, spice, etc) > > new field "bool consoleEnabled" to appropriate entities. I'm just > > worried about the naming of the column and the field - could I use > > these names? Isn't it confusing? I just want to avoid unneeded > > refactoring when the patch is done. > both fits the convention - db columns underscored and java field > camelCased. > > Any feedback is welcome! > > > > Thanks, > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
