On 01/21/2013 10:28 AM, Omer Frenkel wrote:
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Yair Zaslavsky" <[email protected]>
>> To: "Michael Pasternak" <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "Juan Hernandez" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2013 8:27:36 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Michael Pasternak" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "Juan Hernandez" <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:24:58 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
>>>
>>> On 01/17/2013 01:04 PM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
>>>> Once 3.2.0 is released I think we should move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT
>>>> in
>>>> the master branch:
>>>
>>> +1
>> I agree, and this is not the only place where should start marking
> 
> and cluster compatibility version..

all above is true, but Juan meant preparing MVN infra for the next
development iteration, while you're talking about engine internals,
maybe we should file BZs on that (as next version tasks) or should we
define new process of preparing for the next version that will include both?

> 
>> "3.3.0" - what about upgrade scripts?
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/11143
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Michael Pasternak
>>> RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Engine-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Engine-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
>>


-- 

Michael Pasternak
RedHat, ENG-Virtualization R&D
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel

Reply via email to