On 01/30/2013 05:33 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Hernandez" <[email protected]>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:30:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
On 01/30/2013 05:13 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Hernandez" <[email protected]>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:38:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
On 01/30/2013 04:31 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
Hi,
You merge this with the rpm version to 3.3.0 which is totally
invalid.
3.3.0 is a *RELEASE*.
I really don't care what maven approach is, but please do not
create issues with product release cycle.
Alon
That is not true. After this patch the default RPM version is
3.3.0-0.1.$(date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S).
3.3.0 is a release.
0.1.* is the BUILD.
In RPM terms 3.3.0 is the "version", and "0.1.*" is the "release",
see here:
[1] http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html
And make dist produces ovirt-engine-3.3.0.tar.gz which is a
release.
ovirt-engine-3.3.0.tar.gz is not a release, it is just the name of a
tar
file generated by the makefile. The release is the act of the release
managers, on behalf of the community, announcing and publishing some
artifacts, maybe including a tarball generated with the makefile,
maybe
one generated manually, as they see fit.
This where you are wrong, the name of the source tarball is very important in
open source, as this is what open source project actually releases.
The name of the tarball that is published as part of the release is
important, that I agree, maybe not "very" important, but important
anyhow. But what you are saying is that if the name of the file
generated by default by the Makefile is not exactly the same as the
tarball that will be published as part of the release then it is
"totally invalid". That is going too far, in my opinion.
We will discuss this offline.
You are confusing between upstream and downstream, we will have to
fix this before we support more distributions.
I may be confused, of course, but I don't see the connection between
the
name of the tarball generated by the makefile and supporting more
distributions, looks to me like the least important thing in these
regards.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Hernandez" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:26:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] Time to move to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT?
Note that this change has just been merged. Let me know if you
find
any
issue.
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat
S.L.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
--
Dirección Comercial: C/Jose Bardasano Baos, 9, Edif. Gorbea 3, planta
3ºD, 28016 Madrid, Spain
Inscrita en el Reg. Mercantil de Madrid – C.I.F. B82657941 - Red Hat S.L.
_______________________________________________
Engine-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
