Alon, I have FC17, and followed the steps at the wiki , i defined the ovirt nightly repo
[ovirt-nightly] name=ovirt-nightly baseurl=http://resources.ovirt.org/releases/nightly/rpm/Fedora/17/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 priority=1 protect=1 And performed yum install according to your guidelines. It fails to find python-m2crypto Can you please advise on the matter? Many thanks, Yair ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eli Mesika" <[email protected]> > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]> > Cc: "engine-devel" <[email protected]>, "arch" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 3:45:41 AM > Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [ANN] New development environment for ovirt-engine > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <[email protected]> > > To: "engine-devel" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "arch" <[email protected]>, "Sharad Mishra" <[email protected]>, "Limor > > Gavish" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 2:52:51 PM > > Subject: [Engine-devel] [ANN] New development environment for ovirt-engine > > > > Hello all ovirt-engine developers, > > > > When I first joined the ovirt project, it took me about two weeks to setup > > a > > development environment, I needed to work on a bug related to host-deploy > > so > > I needed an environment that could use the ssh, PKI, vdsm-bootstrap and > > communicate with vdsm using SSL, this was virtually impossible to do so > > without tweaking the product in a way that it is so different from > > production use, that I cannot guarantee that whatever tested in development > > will actually work in production. > > > > I peeked at the installation script in a hope that I can create partial > > environment similar to production, but I found that the packaging > > implementation makes to much assumption and is very difficult to adopt. The > > fact that I do not use fedora/rhel for my development made it even worse. > > > > I had no other option than to create rpms after each of my changes and test > > each in real production like setup. > > > > It was obvious to me that the manual customization of developers to achieve > > working product will eventually break as product grow and move away from > > being developer friendly to production friendly. For example, product > > defaults cannot be these which serve developers, but these which serve > > production the best, or having a valid PKI setup cannot be optional any > > more > > as components do need to use it. Same for location of files and > > configuration, for example, if we write a pluggable infrastructure for > > branding, we cannot damage the interface just because developers runs the > > product in their own manual customization. > > > > I took the opportunity handed to me to port the ovirt-engine to other > > distributions in order to provide a development environment that is similar > > to production setup. Together with Sandro Bonazzola and Alex Lourie we > > re-wrote the whole installation of the product which can also be used to > > setup the desired development environment. > > > > Within this environment the product is set up using the same tools and > > configuration as in production, while the process does not require special > > privileges nor changes the state of the developer machine. > > > > A complete documentation is available[1], I preferred to use README within > > the source tree as wiki tend to quickly become obsolete, while > > documentation > > within source tree can be modified by the commit that introduces a change. > > I > > will redirect to this file from the current wiki once the site will be up. > > > > In a nut shell, after installing prerequisites, build and install the > > product > > using: > > > > $ make clean install-dev PREFIX=$HOME/ovirt-engine > > > > This will run maven and create product installation at $HOME/ovirt-engine > > Next, a setup phase is required just like in production, to initialize > > configuration and database: > > > > $ $HOME/ovirt-engine/bin/engine-setup-2 > > > > You have now fully functional product, including PKI, SSL, host-deploy, > > tools. > > No manual database updates are required, no lose of functionality. > > > > All that is left is to start the engine service: > > > > $ $HOME/ovirt-engine/share/ovirt-engine/services/ovirt-engine.py start > > > > Access to application: > > http://localhost:8080 > > https://localhost:8443 > > Debugging port is opened at port 8787. > > > > Farther information exists in the documentation[1]. > > > > There are several inherit benefits of the new environment, the major one is > > the ability to manage several environments in parallel on the same host. > > For > > example, if we develop two separate features on two branches we can install > > the product into $HOME/ovirt-engine-feature1 and > > $HOME/ovirt-engine-feature-2 and have a separate database for each, if we > > modify the ports jboss is listening to we can run two instances of engine > > at > > the same time! > > It is not clear to me why working on 2 bugs needs 2 installations of the > development environment. > If you have 2 different git branches and a separate database for each, its > enough , am I missing something ? > I was used to create a git branch with the name of the BZ# and use > create_db.sh script to create a new database with the BZ# name. > Is this possible in the new method? > Also, does this mean that I will have to create/configure a new workspace for > eclipse each time I am starting to work on a new bug? > > > Thanks > > > > > > We will be happy to work with all developers to assist in porting into the > > new development environment, the simplest is to create a new database for > > this effort. Moti has a sequence of converting the existing database owned > > by postgres to be owned by the engine, Moti, can you please share that? > > > > We are sure there are missing bits, we will be happy to know these so we > > can > > improve. > > > > I am aware that developers (especially java) are conservative, but I ask > > you > > to give us a chance, so that we make it easy for developers to join the > > project, and to allow us to drop the parallel effort of packaging to > > production and fixing the broken development environment. > > > > A special thanks to developers who took the time to test and provide > > feedback > > before the merged: > > - Yaniv Bronheim > > - Moti Asayag > > - Limor Gavish > > - Sharad Mishra > > - Ofer Schreiber > > > > We are hoping that after migration you will be find this environment useful > > and friendly, > > > > Sandro Bonazzola, > > Alex Lourie, > > Alon Bar-Lev. > > > > [1] > > http://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=ovirt-engine.git;a=blob;f=README.developer;hb=HEAD > > _______________________________________________ > > Engine-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
