----- Original Message ----- > From: "Martin Perina" <mper...@redhat.com> > To: engine-devel@ovirt.org > Cc: "Yair Zaslavsky" <yzasl...@redhat.com>, "Barak Azulay" > <bazu...@redhat.com>, "Eli Mesika" <emes...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 1:51:06 PM > Subject: SSH Soft Fencing > > Hi, > > SSH Soft Fencing is a new feature for 3.3 and it tries to restart VDSM > using SSH connection on non responsive hosts prior to real fencing. > More info can be found at > > http://www.ovirt.org/Automatic_Fencing#Automatic_Fencing_in_oVirt_3.3 > > In current SSH Soft Fencing implementation the restart VDSM using SSH > command is part of standard fencing implementation in > VdsNotRespondingTreatmentCommand. But this command is executed only > if a host has a valid PM configuration. If host doesn't have a valid > PM configuration, the execution of the command is disabled and host > state is change to Non Responsive. > > So my question are: > > 1) Should SSH Soft Fencing be executed on hosts without valid PM > configuration?
I think that the answer should be yes. The vdsm restart will solve most of problems , so why not using it whether a PM agent is defined or not. > > 2) Should VDSM restart using SSH command be reimplemented > as standalone command to be usable also in other parts of engine? > If 1) is true, I think it will have to be done anyway. +1 > > > Martin Perina > _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
