On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:18:53PM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Il 29/11/2013 13:13, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto: > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:49:59AM +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >> Il 29/11/2013 09:43, Gianluca Cecchi ha scritto: > >>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Meeting summary > >>>>> --------------- > >>>>> * Agenda and roll Call (doron, 15:02:42) > >>>>> * 3.3 update releases (doron, 15:04:23) > >>>>> * 3.4 planning (doron, 15:04:24) > >>>>> * conferences and workshops (doron, 15:04:26) > >>>>> * infra update (doron, 15:04:27) > >>>>> * other topics (doron, 15:04:29) > >>>>> * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/admin/projects/ovirt-release ~ > >>>>> (danken, 15:12:58) > >>>>> * LINK: http://gerrit.ovirt.org/21794 (mburns, 15:15:04) > >>>>> * LINK: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-release/16800/ (mburns, > >>>>> 15:15:48) > >>>>> * mburns to add sbonazzo as a maintainer to support ovirt-release > >>>>> project (doron, 15:18:17) > >>>> > >>>> ovirt-release-9 released yesterday > >>> > >>> BTW: I see that this package contains > >>> /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo > >>> (and ovirt-release-fedora-8-1.noarch already did so) > >>> By default all lines are disabled in it. > >>> When and how this repo should be enabled? Only when using nightly or > >>> only under developers/maintainers indications? > >> > >> I think that fedora-virt-preview should be used with nightly, stable > >> shouldn't need it. > >> However, since fedora-virt-preview contains vdsm - related packages not > >> needed if you run only ovirt-engine (without using the same host as > >> hypervisor) I think it's better to wait for VDSM guys answer. > > > > Vdsm is not in > > http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-20/x86_64/ > > > > virt-preview is not needed for ovirt-3.3, and frankly, I think it should > > be dropped from ovirt-release. > > > > It used to be needed on the nodes when vdsm required a version of > > libvirt that was not yet in Fedora. Now that we have el6 as a > > fully-supported platform, and given that el6 is missing from > > virt-preview, virt-preview is much less helpful to us. > > > > Dan. > > > > So, any objection in removing virt-preview from ovirt-release? > What about nightly? Will it be needed there?
Should be removed from both, since it is currently unused. We could reintroduce it if the need arises. _______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
