Why not move it to vds_static?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Gilad Chaplik <gchap...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > I propose to split vds_dynamic table into 2 tables: > - vds_dynamic > - vds_on_boot > We need a place to put all non-dynamic data that gets updated once the > host is booted, and I think dynamic isn't the place for it. > In first phase we will put there NUMA host topoplogy, but later on migrate > all non-dynamic host data (cpu, os, etc.). > > thoughts? > > Thanks, > Gilad. > _______________________________________________ > Engine-devel mailing list > Engine-devel@ovirt.org > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel >
_______________________________________________ Engine-devel mailing list Engine-devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-devel
