Roy Golan has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: core, engine: New validations for host entrance in clusters
......................................................................


Patch Set 1:

(5 comments)

....................................................
File 
backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/HandleVdsCpuFlagsOrClusterChangedCommand.java
Line 22: @NonTransactiveCommandAttribute
Line 23: public class HandleVdsCpuFlagsOrClusterChangedCommand<T extends 
VdsActionParameters> extends VdsCommand<T> {
Line 24: 
Line 25:     private boolean _hasFlags = true;
Line 26:     private boolean _architectureMismatch = false;
1. I prefer positive checks. more intuitive and less effort to grasp 
architectureMatch instead of the negative form.  

2. please don't use  _ prefix for private members.
_hasFlag should also be changed(not for this patch)
Line 27:     private boolean foundCPU = true;
Line 28: 
Line 29:     public HandleVdsCpuFlagsOrClusterChangedCommand(T parameters) {
Line 30:         super(parameters);


Line 61:                     .getName(), getVds().getCpuFlags());
Line 62:         }
Line 63: 
Line 64:         // Checks whether the host and the cluster have the same 
architecture
Line 65:         if (_hasFlags && foundCPU && 
!grp.getArchitecture().equals(ArchitectureType.undefined) &&
use != Architecture.undefined. 

the default in the DB is anyway 0 so we should hit NPE never
Line 66:                 !sc.getArchitecture().equals(grp.getArchitecture())) {
Line 67:             _architectureMismatch = true;
Line 68: 
Line 69:             addCustomValue("VdsArchitecture", 
sc.getArchitecture().name());


Line 62:         }
Line 63: 
Line 64:         // Checks whether the host and the cluster have the same 
architecture
Line 65:         if (_hasFlags && foundCPU && 
!grp.getArchitecture().equals(ArchitectureType.undefined) &&
Line 66:                 !sc.getArchitecture().equals(grp.getArchitecture())) {
ServerCpu also shouldn't be null so != is safe to use. infact if it would be 
null I want this to fail to we would know something is configured wrong
Line 67:             _architectureMismatch = true;
Line 68: 
Line 69:             addCustomValue("VdsArchitecture", 
sc.getArchitecture().name());
Line 70:             addCustomValue("VdsGroupArchitecture", 
grp.getArchitecture().name());


Line 78:                     ExecutionHandler.createInternalJobContext());
Line 79:         }
Line 80: 
Line 81:         // if cluster doesn't have cpu then get the cpu from the vds
Line 82:         if (_hasFlags && foundCPU && !_architectureMismatch && 
StringUtils.isEmpty(vdsGroupCpuName)) {
any chance to simplify this? if there is a match then the check of hasFlags and 
foundCPU are already true due to the code in line 62
Line 83:             // update group with the cpu name
Line 84: 
Line 85:             grp.setcpu_name(sc.getCpuName());
Line 86:             grp.setArchitecture(null);


Line 82:         if (_hasFlags && foundCPU && !_architectureMismatch && 
StringUtils.isEmpty(vdsGroupCpuName)) {
Line 83:             // update group with the cpu name
Line 84: 
Line 85:             grp.setcpu_name(sc.getCpuName());
Line 86:             grp.setArchitecture(null);
why null and not undefind? this not aligned with the db.

the UpdateVdsGroup.getArchitercture should be change - we shouldn't assume null 
as a valid value. 

we should always use the Architecture.undefined value. its preferred to just 
null in any way.
Line 87: 
Line 88:             // use suppress in order to update group even if action 
fails
Line 89:             // (out of the transaction)
Line 90:             VdsGroupOperationParameters tempVar = new 
VdsGroupOperationParameters(grp);


-- 
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/22029
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia617481b102b3d5383a0d38da03e10ff95afefe2
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Project: ovirt-engine
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Vitor de Lima <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Gustavo Frederico Temple Pedrosa 
<[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Leonardo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Roy Golan <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Vitor de Lima <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: [email protected]
Gerrit-Reviewer: oVirt Jenkins CI Server
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
_______________________________________________
Engine-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/engine-patches

Reply via email to