On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:12:57 +0000, James Adam wrote: > Might this be due to the fact that Rails will render a view even if > there's no corresponding controller action behind it? I.E. even though > you are removing the 'new' action, because the 'new.rhtml' file is > present and locatable, Rails will presume that you want to render > that.
Ah! Yes, that's exactly what it is. I never realized that feature of Rails (but it's perfect, as I was just about to create a bunch of pseudo-actions for some static pages, and now I don't have to). So no, I can't think of a way around it either - if new.rhtml exists in the search path, then it exists, and there's no way to negate that. For my current case, re-rendering a different page is fine; I guess if it ever becomes a real problem, I'll just think harder. Jay _______________________________________________ engine-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org
