I vote for Collaboa for hackability reasons. Mauro
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: "James Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected], > [email protected] > Betreff: [Engine-users] Engines on the move.... > Datum: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:20:52 +0000 > > Hi all, > > In the next few days or so, the engines SVN repository is going to be > moving from the (excellent) opensvn hosts to their own server, > http://dev.rails-engines.org/svn/. The repository is mirrored there at > the moment, but eventually this will become the primary location for > development, and where 'script/plugin' will download from. There's no > need to switch your copies quite yet, however, I'll post again when > the 'official' switch happens. > > What I would like to know is if anyone has any preferences over the > bug tracking software we use. I have both Trac and Collaboa running at > the moment, and I'm leaning towards Collaboa, purely in terms of > hackability given it's written in Ruby. However, if anyone can make a > strong case for either, I'd definitely like to know. > > - James > > -- > * J * > ~ > _______________________________________________ > engine-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org > -- Telefonieren Sie schon oder sparen Sie noch? NEU: GMX Phone_Flat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/telefonie _______________________________________________ engine-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org
