Can you post the actual error messages, and also the version of the
Engines plugin you're using? (You can find it in
/vendor/plugins/engines/init.rb). I'm determined to nail this issue
today.
FWIW, the :edge flag should no longer be relevant.
- james
On 5/25/06, Anton J Aylward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sadly your blog was not a lot of use.
> I'm just trying to get this to run as a demo on my own Linux server with
> WebBrick. No FCGI, no Apache. ZILCH.
> So the stuff about .htaccess, Dreamhost, deployment etc is not relevant.
>
> I'm trying to do the **bare minimum** to get this to work, not deploy it
> "in the wild". I'm trying to solve the very basic problem.
>
> Yes I tried the
> CONFIG = {:edge => true}
> thing and variation on that I found at other sites.
> The RikiEngline package had the various 'require' and 'start'
> items you discuss already in it.
>
>
>
> Casper Fabricius wrote:
> > I have experienced a lot of problems when deploying the combination of
> > FastCGI, Rails 1.1.2 in the vendors-dir and User- and Logine-engines,
> > especially those dreaded NoMethodErrors. You might want to take a look on my
> > description of how to overcome various problems when deploying, since you
> > seem to have similar problems:
> > http://casperfabricius.com/blog/2006/05/21/rails-on-dreamhost/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anton J
> > Aylward
> > Sent: 25. maj 2006 13:43
> > To: Discussion of the use of existing Engines
> > Subject: Re: [Engine-users] Upgrading Rails to 1.1
> >
> > I had a similar trace when I downloaded the demo of RikiEngine_0_3_2.
> > I have
> > actionpack-1.12.1
> > rails-1.1.2
> > activerecord-1.14.2
> >
> > I did try, as you suggest, upgrading the engine plugin.
> > I also tried upgrading user_engine and login_engine.
> >
> > The result was catastrophic, even more error messages spewed.
> > It was now complaining about what seemed to be the innards of the Oracle
> > and FCGI adapters, among many things.
> >
> >
> > I gave up.
> > Until I saw this thread.
> >
> > I really like the IDEA of the packaging that 'engines' represents, but
> > there does seem to be problems with the deployment.
>
> _______________________________________________
> engine-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org
>
--
* J *
~
_______________________________________________
engine-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org
