On 11/15/06, James Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And if you don't want the LoginEngine (& maybe UserEngine), then plz > > turn them into orphanaged RubyForge projects, so others can pick them > > up if they want to improve them... > > That's an interesting idea, Wybo. What does everyone else think about this?
I have to agree. I personally wish that James Adam will be my Rails Engines *engine* (I mean, plugin) hero, not the do-it-all handyman who spawns every possible use of engine at his disposal. LoginEngine & UserEngine may be good for... (forgive me) "demo" of Engines' capabilities, but "real" tasks should be left to individual developers so e.g. ActiveRBAC can live a happy life. If you somehow "bundle" (even if just virtually, by putting your engines in your site, although not directly inside engines plugin distribution) your own Engines, they seem like they're "official" engines, and other engines that serve the same purpose is "inferioriated". I take it you don't want to be the next Microsoft but in the Rails world :-) (Windows Media Player, MSIE, Movie Maker, ... aren't they "engines"?) -- Hendy Irawan Web: http://hendy.gauldong.net Mobile: +62 856 24889899 Yahoo Messenger: ceefour666 _______________________________________________ engine-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rails-engines.org/listinfo.cgi/engine-users-rails-engines.org
