Tacvek wrote:
>
> The changes to ant.lua: were any of them functional, or were they just
> updates to the new style of
> Lua 5.0? Also you might want to update 'data/levels/ant.lua' (the
> temporary compatibility copy.)
Now that you ask, no they weren't functional. I didn't notice that we
have LUA_COMPAT_VARARG set in luaconf.h
> And the changes to ant33.lua: instead of calling the returned function
> of cells{} directly, the callback calls an anonymous argumentless
> function that explcitly calls the return value of cell{}. Is that correct?
I think so, but that's why I asked for someone to playtest the level.
> It might be wise to look through the other antXX.lua levels to se if he
> used the same thing elsewhere.
I just did, I couldn't find another occurrence of this particular "pattern".
- Daniel
_______________________________________________
Enigma-devel mailing list
Enigma-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/enigma-devel
