On 05/02/14 16:06, Onno Ekker wrote:
> Well, to me it would also make sense to encrypt to the newest key by
> default (by creation date), which would eliminate the need to create a per
> recipient rule in most cases...

Do we have an idea of cases / scenarios where per-recipient rules are
necessary? This can be helpful to know in case we want to design around
them.

> Having per recipient rules also brings the necessity to manage and maintain
> those rules.

Indeed, and having to cope with all the complexity that comes with it.

Cheers,
arne

-- 
Arne Renkema-Padmos
Doctoral researcher
CASED, TU Darmstadt
@hcisec, secuso.org

_______________________________________________
enigmail-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net

Reply via email to