On 07/10/2014 06:18 PM, Samir Nassar wrote: > On Thursday, 2014-07-10 17:53:52 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> > wrote: >> But i'm concerned because it seems like enigmail ought to be able to >> parse the kmail construction, at least if the top-level cleartext part >> is itself multipart/signed. > > I am happy to help. I'm running KMail 4.13.2, is your reference to kmail > 1.13.7 perhaps KMail 4.13.7 ?
huh, weird. your mail header shows:
User-Agent:
KMail/4.13.2 (Linux/3.15.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.2; x86_64; ; )
My other correspondent's mail header shows:
User-Agent:
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
It seems unlikely that they were actually using KMail 1.13.7 this week :)
> If you need a KMail person to send emails back and forth for testing, I am
> always happy to help.
Could you send me (privately) an encrypted and signed message with your
kmail instance? I don't care what it says, but leave the body as a
simple text/plain part -- no HTML formatting or attachments, and ask
kmail to sign/encrypt with PGP/MIME. Please encrypt it to my key
0x0EE5BE979282D80B9F7540F1CCD2ED94D21739E9.
I'll evaluate the structure and report back here on the list.
thanks for the quick volunteering, Samir!
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
