-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 17.03.15 20:09, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi Enigmail folks-- > > Thanks for the enigmail v1.8 release, i hope to have it in debian > experimental later today. > > I notice that the enigmail tagging scheme maps version 1.8 to > enigmail-1-8. Presumably this is a holdover from the CVS days > where a tag couldn't have a . in it. > > With git, tags can have . in them. It would make my life a little > bit easier as a packager [0] to have the version string explicitly > represented as 1.8 in the tag, where possible. What do you think > about moving to an "enigmail-1.8" style of tag for future > releases? > > I recognize this is not of crucial importance, but if there are no > reasons to keep the old pattern besides inertia, maybe a change is > acceptable?
Yes, I think we can move away from enigmail-x-y to enigmail-x.y. I'll try to remember this when doing the next release. - -Patrick -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVCSiJAAoJENsRh7ndX2k7f5kP+wYOMRMCBGXSORh4w2/EKOtb mdt8NJQ0NduMU4XDwLLbScrgmsBwQb7TrrkLmUrAAlLjbT0cIQqVDG+0cF4zNsd2 TQBxBiMTh023X68r7/IGUuNxQaWPOoTI63HsfNdiYCW24x5AV7z0oCvvjz0vN1ew or9/3SsmlYxkqXBCbU0kf4GxuQQs+mKdQ/iSHxzqWOaij/Ad60MufUHDFJCUmQCQ TVGDUPwEXJNLkyh26qp2TNzt53NHLPjXDCSrm/EdBPFZufMNcXhXL76uK/pyp7c9 bn6OrhaWQBzWMTzFHkojzam1co3aieR3H40HHhcdBvXQA0LJ6e9bcj8G3UgMrd58 JP1LqVssAc30ulGXBm+oz6Hvpjnht2i/T+OK8yaWAIRuf7rvUCrMAnnYfAlg3ZO5 xFVKYnRFTbrXYdkCCI4ZgS6TWoxTbWGwtBF2XdhRWZYvLLCk/1Cq5iLy7ca2K9qS gpXNTzlkFAObsQ1OL1ZD4EUE7KbZx12FrWwciIYhH4YW23yxZNYgXnaCSW/8hpqF /nPPFDm7xctSz3wenkp1uWBytf2zVyTiPdSaOt1epA1yrjFNH1bucE1/BjrQHGVm ihB8DxIWx/07dUj0dVIu91RBPsFAvRnQxfd/mVje3k66YccuyozHf8pTliZSi6en Vvgtus068fwhqixa1n4a =0EKp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
