-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 3/21/2015 06:36, Olav Seyfarth wrote: > Hi Patrick, > >> I'm thinking about adding "--allow-weak-digest-algos" to the GnuPG >> parameters if GnuPG > 2.0.27 is detected. Would you think this is >> a good idea to get rid of the problem -- or this just postponing >> the problem? > > Please don't. MD5 IS an issue and should not be trusted by default. > Same line of thinking as with the red warning about unencrypted > messages. We should provide (or link to) a help/FAQ page how to solve > it.
Is there any way in GPG to change the digest used with an older key? I have a SHA-1 digest in a key that I use, and I'd like to make that SHA-256 if possible. - -- http://www.glib.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVDZDKAAoJEFxfeKGiIGeDR44QAI3yntypI4kg0bFhbQnZ5YWl b5q/P5bwjV5jqclNBkz3DryCEIPrK68E19Soq7DtO7VFUYJjCRFZdCZIBZeBMNwE w2577Lr6Y4Q6pON6VUDHojp7e3ZtG8yQf7yJ7hRwRX+c89jBxTrkYjMn5psBRLVZ iE02GSLTzxqpcZ6jv+w9gLco6J4MANJi7zFLALANS4CKjphmXqBYX1NuzdIMejas 8XQHCmpXGFNXyXh2CpQY24bVoooVp18UqFUhrQS3fBywGe8n7sHOG1QgFnsihrpR 9f0xuioQcc8cAPROdNBlMh7fF/mi56kGGOrlWSawg9Jcs5whxs2j+hzwwXTvOgL2 D2XNUugXb1FyMsFBVy5HlKy6hBNtl7QUoEIhCFc0mxF1K10u25SiZYnmYu+CiGbL IyhfM1yowkV/ZN4peW3ImMy9/VBbnDt/M5ZnC8cwOKOUunVNpzLuI3Rwlo0h1N4z MbF5RGOMowgNGclQWB1AVI6Xxo4oNcEJ0t2gDmQRrz6HZlQbTqaryKzLqATanFGT Il55x/wNonzgTiTImQUA+d1dmh6cIV9CuOJWuLwOV0Whm6uK0NMclHX5DfpZnTBh XvGDdM5DYRyEOozdSqh+ARcOB/cfR85VpYGdL/FyW3axl5Q1L9iL+SGEiIFg5Ztg K9vUhrqUY35sVuHVAORH =elSa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
