On 05.07.17 22:04, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > hey enigmail folks-- > > i see the use of unicode code point U+2705 (HEAVY WHITE CHECK MARK) in > importInfoSuccess as broken with some font sets. > > here's a view of the import key dialog box on Debian with the standard > set of fonts involved:> > i suspect there's a general expectation that this should be a green > circle around a white checkmark, but not all fonts have that particular > glyph (some don't have any glyph for that codepoint at all). > > U+2714 HEAVY CHECK MARK seems to be a more widely-supported glyph, but > it doesn't look quite as flashy as what i imagine you're expecting. > > Would there be any objection to moving to U+2714? Or could we use an > explicit graphical icon instead so that we don't have to rely on the > vagaries of font glyphsets?
I think I better replace the label by an image. -Patrick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ enigmail-users mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe or make changes to your subscription click here: https://admin.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/enigmail-users_enigmail.net
