On Friday, 01 August 2003, at 18:06:27 (+0200),
Kim Woelders wrote:

> I think the URL's in configure.in should be removed.  URL's tend to
> become obsolete

You're right there.

> and I doubt people have problems finding the stuff anyway.

You'd be surprised.  People usually have no trouble finding
Enlightenment, but because the companion tools/libs are in the same
project on SF, people seem to have quite a bit of difficulty finding
them.

That said, I'm not too worried about the URL's in E 0.16, since
anybody who hasn't had that stuff for ages probably won't be using the
new release anyway.  So feel free to nuke them if you wish; that's why
we have the 'sf trigger in e-bawt anyway. :-)

Cheers,
Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Chest bumping...something you never see two women do."  "I'd pay a
  lot of money to see it, though."
              -- Patricia Richardson and Tim Allen, "Home Improvement"


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to