On Thursday, 22 April 2004, at 11:56:42 (+1000),
Martien Verbruggen wrote:

> The changes should be backward compatible, i.e. no programs compiled
> against 0.7 should need changes, or should display changes in
> behaviour. There is a single new API function
> (Epplet_Loop_Iteration(int block)), which takes a single argument
> specifying whether the iteration should block or not.

How extensively have you tested this?  Just glancing over the code, it
seems like it would break recurring timers.

Michael

-- 
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX)  http://www.kainx.org/  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/       Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Pleure pas petite sirene, la ville dort encore.  Ton histoire
  commence a peine.  Pleure pas petite sirene, le jour attend dehors
  dans les brumes et les fontaines."                 -- Francis Cabrel


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to