On Tuesday, 01 June 2004, at 01:31:10 (+0200), Kim Woelders wrote: > OK, that makes sense. > I would like to bump the Release number in between pre's, so what to > do then? Assuming we have 0.99.3 now, what should be the minor bumps up > to 0.99.4? 0.99.4a, 0.99.4b, ... or 0.99.3.1, 0.99.3.2, ..., or what?
0.99.3.1 and so forth. a's and b's are more likely to confuse version comparison than help anything. Without going into detail about how version comparisons work, I'll just say that the goal is to eliminate ambiguity, and the easiest way to do that is to separate version/subversion info with dots and always go incrementally. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "But I dumped her. My motto is, 'Get out before they go down.'" "That is so *not* my motto." -- Monica Geller and Joey Tribbiani, "Friends" ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
