Am Thu, 3 Jun 2004 16:51:28 -0400 schrieb Michael Jennings: > On Thursday, 03 June 2004, at 22:37:02 (+0200), > Kim Woelders wrote: > > > >What license has e16menuedit? I took GPL for my code, but if you > > >like I > > >could also change it to BSD. > > > > > There doesn't really seem to be a license with e16menuedit. Your > > code > > you can of course license however you want. I don't care too much > > one > > way or the other. Maybe there are others who do. > > e16keyedit and e16menuedit, like E itself, are BSD-licensed. We > strongly prefer the BSD license over the GPL/LGPL license.
I've read the licence in E and I've no problems with BSD-style licens. But why do you prefer BSD-stlye licenses over the GPL/LGPL license? What do you think are the benefits? regards Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
