Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-25 15:01]: > > IMHO, the last point is really weak. If we don't use ecore_event because > > event handlers are always global and not tied to a specific object, we > > admit that the system sucks :] > > it's a convenience that this works this way. but not essential. one thing a > change would involve is a change in a reasonable amount of code (and non trivial > changes)... what we need to weight up - is - is this worth it? do we have both > ways of doing it (at least for a while) as a transition?
Sure, why not ;) > > IMHO two, most users (developers) don't care whether the API is similar > > to Evas, because they'll prolly never use Evas' callback system > > directly, because that's what they use ecore_evas for. > > well you end up having to use it one way or the other. if not evas's callback > system you end up using edje's callback system... or using ewl's! :) Yeah, but ecore_evas has nothing to do with Edje and Ewl, and it's part of ecore after all ;) So, you don't like the idea of moving to ecore_event? :] -- Regards, Tilman ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
