On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:08:41 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday, 25 August 2004, at 08:55:15 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > not anymore. it relies on the system libltdl now.
>
> Yeah, I discovered that after I went back and checked the revert you
> committed. Would it help/hurt to put --ltdl on the end of the
> libtoolize call? Or should we just apply this patch and move on? It
> kinda bugs me that we're now expecting end users to have libtool
> installed....
the thing is - its installed for most things now anyway. :( it's become a base
package - so why ship our own? :) personally i'd be happy to use dlopen()
myself. i really stopped giving a rats about porting to systems that dont
support .so's long ago.
--
------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
The Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
熊耳 - 車君 (数田) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tokyo, Japan (東京 日本)
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
