On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:09:19 +0100 Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Bbabbled:
(B
(B> Corey Donohoe wrote:
(B> > I'll see about tending to this when I get home this evening. Someone
(B> > recently mentioned that the pam_close_session is being called to
(B> > early, and should be called from entrance_login(which isn't possible).
(B>
(B> Why isn't this possible? The documentation says that it should be
(B> possible to run pam_open_session and pam_close_session from two
(B> different processes.
(B
(Bentrance_login was there to nuke entrances memory usage. even if entrance frees
(Bsome upper allocs may still keep its pages in ram there and require a swap out.
(Bthat exec was to nuke entrance's login manager down to a tiny size so it uses
(Balmost no ram during your login :)
(B
(B--
(B------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------
(BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B)
(B
(B
(B-------------------------------------------------------
(BThe SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
(BGet a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
(BIt's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
(B_______________________________________________
(Benlightenment-devel mailing list
([email protected]
(Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
