Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:58:17 +0100 Tilman Sauerbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-17 18:54]:
Implemented desktops as a list, instead of an array. Moved
e_desk_current_get, e_desk_at_xy_get to e_zone_desk_current_get and
e_zone_desk_at_xy_get.
Anyone against?
You should wait for raster and Andy to comment on this, IIRC there was a
good reason for *not* using a list.
this data struct is unlikely to change often - it likely will change a few times
when a user sets something up then remain static for just about ever. it is
simpler to access, address and manage an array of these - it can be changed, but
being 2d in nature an array massively simplifies access. if it was 1d it'd much
closer to "much of a muchness" but being 2d means u need lists of lists... and
that just becomes painful unless u REALLY have a need for it. :)
Alright, it's gone now :)
Sebastian
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
