On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:15:55 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: (B (B> On Friday 11 March 2005 12:13 pm, Michael Jennings wrote: (B> > Are you certain? I believe the .la files contain dependency (B> > information for those systems that require it. The .a files are (B> > certainly unnecessary, though, and can be easily omitted using the (B> > --disable-static parameter to autogen.sh/configure. (B> (B> i think we're talking about the .la files for the loaders, not the main (B> 'libImlib2.*' files ... in the normal course of things, if you link against (B> libImlib2.so and have it load say jpeg.so, jpeg.la and jpeg.a are not (B> needed ... the .la file is only used by libtool at build time which is why (B> you always want libImlib2.la ... (B> (B> i dont think it's possible at all to link against the loaders directly is it ? (B (B> so shouldnt the loader's .a and .la files be prunned from the normal `make (B> install` target ? (B (Byup - they probably should be - but i havent gotten in the mood to play atuofoo (Bgames to do this lately :) (B (B-- (B------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" -------------- (BThe Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) [EMAIL PROTECTED] $BMg9%B?(B [EMAIL PROTECTED] (BTokyo, Japan ($BEl5~(B $BF|K\(B) (B (B (B------------------------------------------------------- (BSF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide (BRead honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. (BDiscover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. (Bhttp://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click (B_______________________________________________ (Benlightenment-devel mailing list ([email protected] (Bhttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
