On Thursday 21 April 2005 05:08 pm, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 April 2005, at 19:05:18 (-0400),
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > windows.c and screen.c look fine, but pixmap.c looks a little fishy:
> > XChangeProperty(Xdisplay, TermWin.parent,
> >             props[PROP_EWMH_ICON], XA_CARDINAL, 32, PropModeReplace,
> >             (unsigned char *) icon_data, sizeof(icon_data) /
> > sizeof(CARD32)); i dont really know anything about X functions, so you
> > guys would know whether this is fine too ...
>
> The fix went into a header file, though, right?  (I'm on a hella slow
> connection right now, so I can't check myself.) :(

the patch i committed applied against src/command.h and that's it ... i was 
just checking other things to see if similar fixes could be used elsewhere 
and i noticed pixmap.c ... so i'm asking for someone else to verify that this 
code is 32bit/64bit clean since i know nothing of X functions

> On Wednesday, 20 April 2005, at 21:47:28 (-0400),
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Roland B=E4r submitted this patch:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D52947&action=3Dview
> > via this bug:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D84520
> >
> > in an attempt to get the code working for amd64 ... patch is not ok as
> > is, = but=20
> > if the x86-specific code is wrapped in #ifdef __i386__ and then amd64
> > code = is=20
> > wrapped in #ifdef __x86_64__, this shoud be ok to commit ?
>
> My policy:  Test it on i386.  If it doesn't break that, commit it,
> because that's all I have to test with and can't yell at you if it
> Works For Me(tm).  *grin*
>
> Your approach sounds fine.  I always watch commits to make sure the
> patches that go in are acceptable, so don't worry about "sneaking one
> past the goalie."

ok, i'll clean it up and commit it
-mike


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to