On Sun, 24 Apr 2005, Bryan Kadzban wrote: > > Why not strtoul and unsigned longs? >
Ahh, that sounds like a far better idea. I didn't know of strtoul. I thought having to do a ">> 32" to check the string thereafter was unnecessarily complicated. Presumably the "less than zero" error would then be removed altogther? Dylan. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans! Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix _______________________________________________ enlightenment-devel mailing list enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
