> Of course. Since I wrote the stupid program myself, I have no idea what > the heck I'm talking about. I'd give you an answer but you don't deserve > one, so I'll let you figure it out on your own, oh wise one.
why the attitude? have i insulted you in any way? i dont think so. even so, i apologize. i didnt know you wrote the progi, but this may help, as you probably the one most familiar with the code. entrance is a beautiful display manager, and we'd really like to deploy it in our site. we have several hundreds of users, whose accounts sit on a central nfs server. as is accustomed in these circumstances, we set the nfs to root squash, from security reasons. this has worked till now, and entranced is the _only_ display manager which cannot handle it. a pitty. All i asked is a simple question. a "no, we will not support root squash. maybe when hell froze over" would be acceptable. it will mean we will not use entrance, though, but there are other options. personally, i would not like to hear such an answer, and would prefer smthing like "no, we dont support it yet. if you want, implement it yourself". i'd do that, but first i need the reasons why it wasn't supported in the first place. bye. -- ========================================================= Nir Tzachar.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
