On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:55:48 +0200 Christian Pedaschus writes:
> they're too wild for the list? now i'm really curious ;)
> why don't you enlighten us all, jose?
>
> greets, chris
>
>
There's little or none that I can provide, on anything..
Seek thou the being known as "the rasterman" instead :)
However, there are others out there that maybe could
share their thoughts on all kinds of things..
Look at things like "eterm", "evidence", "entrance",
"ewl", "ecore", etc, etc,...
These are truly nice works, and one can only wonder
what it is that those who work on these think about them..
What capabilities would they like to add to them?
How do these compare with similar others in the Gnome/Kde
world? What would they like for "e" (in the larger sense)
to have that they could use for advancing things?
I've noticed lately the beginnings of an "exml" and
an "evfs", both of which seem to me to be potentially very
useful systems..
What others are there that "e" could use?
Jose.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel
