On Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:02 pm, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Tuesday, 30 August 2005, at 22:16:40 (-0400),
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > setting the rpath to the system paths is generally pointless and forces
> > Eterm to load libraries from /usr/lib before looking at user-specified
> > paths (from ld.so.conf or more importantly the LD_LIBRARY_PATH envvar)
> >
> > if you read the ELF spec, it dictates that the dynamic loader will search
> > DT_RPATH paths (/usr/lib and /usr/lib/Eterm here) before checking
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> That is correct, and entirely meaningless.
>
> The reason it's done is so that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not required on
> platforms (like Solaris) without ld.so.conf and such.  Sure, in your
> particular case, $(libdir) and $(prefix)/lib and so forth may all be
> the same and may all be system paths.  That is NOT the case in
> general, and adding the rpaths hurts NOTHING whatsoever.

or configure.in/Makefile.am could be updated to make this a buildtime option 
and default to off for say linux hosts

but considering your explanation in the previous e-mail, i dont think you'll 
go for this ;)
-mike


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
enlightenment-devel mailing list
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/enlightenment-devel

Reply via email to